Hi Wolfram, On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:53:26 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:04:42AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > > > > Now that thhis is in mainline ... I suggest two more changes: > > > > > > - at24 (i2c eeprom) doesn't need to be EXPERIMENTAL > > > > > > - we still need interfaces whereby kernel code can be > > > given handles to the EEPROM devices, and then use > > > them to read board config data out during boot. > > > > > > Obviously, the first one is easy. ;) > > > > Indeed, but where's the patch? > > I may be missing some irony here, but just in case I don't, here is a > patch :) Don't know if this qualifies as irony. I was simply wondering why David was telling us that a change could be done instead of just doing it himself if he cared. > From 622e104ea7c0ee99c631701919289792c8a890a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:46:11 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] at24: remove EXPERIMENTAL > > This driver has been widely used since inclusion and no problems have > been reported. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig > index c76df8c..89fec05 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ menu "EEPROM support" > > config EEPROM_AT24 > tristate "I2C EEPROMs from most vendors" > - depends on I2C && SYSFS && EXPERIMENTAL > + depends on I2C && SYSFS > help > Enable this driver to get read/write support to most I2C EEPROMs, > after you configure the driver to know about each EEPROM on > Thanks, patch applied. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
