On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:04:42AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > Now that thhis is in mainline ... I suggest two more changes: > > > > - at24 (i2c eeprom) doesn't need to be EXPERIMENTAL > > > > - we still need interfaces whereby kernel code can be > > given handles to the EEPROM devices, and then use > > them to read board config data out during boot. > > > > Obviously, the first one is easy. ;) > > Indeed, but where's the patch? I may be missing some irony here, but just in case I don't, here is a patch :) === From 622e104ea7c0ee99c631701919289792c8a890a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:46:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] at24: remove EXPERIMENTAL This driver has been widely used since inclusion and no problems have been reported. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig index c76df8c..89fec05 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ menu "EEPROM support" config EEPROM_AT24 tristate "I2C EEPROMs from most vendors" - depends on I2C && SYSFS && EXPERIMENTAL + depends on I2C && SYSFS help Enable this driver to get read/write support to most I2C EEPROMs, after you configure the driver to know about each EEPROM on -- Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
