Am 2021-05-21 12:09, schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:53 PM Matti Vaittinen
<matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Changelog v2: (based on suggestions by Michael Walle)
- drop gpio_regmap_set_drvdata()
But why do we have gpio_regmap_get_drvdata() and why is it different
now to the new member handling?
Eg. the reg_mask_xlate() callback is just passed a "struct
gpio_regmap*".
If someone needs to access private data there, gpio_regmap_get_drvdata()
is used. At least that was its intention.
Thus I was also suggesting to use "struct gpio_regmap*" in the newer
callbacks.
I don't get what you mean by "different to the new member handling"?
-michael
