Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio: regmap: Support few IC specific operations

["Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2021-05-21 at 12:19 +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2021-05-21 12:09, schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
> > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:53 PM Matti Vaittinen
> > <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Changelog v2: (based on suggestions by Michael Walle)
> > >   - drop gpio_regmap_set_drvdata()
> > 
> > But why do we have gpio_regmap_get_drvdata() and why is it
> > different
> > now to the new member handling?
> 
> Eg. the reg_mask_xlate() callback is just passed a "struct 
> gpio_regmap*".
> If someone needs to access private data there,
> gpio_regmap_get_drvdata()
> is used. At least that was its intention.

I would help the IC driver here too and just directly provide the
drvdata pointer as argument. I don't see much value in providing the
regmap_gpio pointer as IC driver can not dereference it.

> 
> Thus I was also suggesting to use "struct gpio_regmap*" in the newer
> callbacks.
> 
> I don't get what you mean by "different to the new member handling"?
> 
> -michael