Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio: regmap: Support few IC specific operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2021-05-21 at 13:09 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:53 PM Matti Vaittinen
> <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The set_config and init_valid_mask GPIO operations are usually very
> > IC
> > specific. Allow IC drivers to provide these custom operations at
> > gpio-regmap registration.
> 
> Thanks for this. In general (from design p.o.v.) looks good to me,
> one
> question below, though.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > ---
> > Changelog v2: (based on suggestions by Michael Walle)
> >   - drop gpio_regmap_set_drvdata()
> 
> But why do we have gpio_regmap_get_drvdata()

I was thinking the drivers might still need to get the drvdata. But now
I don't see how they could easily get it via this API. Yes, the
regmap_gpio struct (which is used to obtain the data via this API) is
returned by the registration - but the only place where IC driver could
store this is in the drvdata :) So yes, this is next to useless now.

Sure this API could be used in probe, after the registration - but
there the driver should have access to drvdata and config anyways.

I'll drop also the gpio_regmap_get_drvdata() in next version. Thanks
for pointing this out.

>  and why is it different
> now to the new member handling?

Hmm. I am unsure what you mean by this?

> 
> >   - drop checks and WARN() for pretty much impossible cases





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux