On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:54 PM Matti Vaittinen
<matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Utilize the gpio-regmap helper and drop the custom functions
I like the statistics of this change!
FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changelog:
> - No changes
>
> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71815.c | 106 ++++++++++--------------------------
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> index 1dd0ec6727fd..97e1348cd410 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> @@ -1120,6 +1120,7 @@ config GPIO_BD70528
> config GPIO_BD71815
> tristate "ROHM BD71815 PMIC GPIO support"
> depends on MFD_ROHM_BD71828
> + select GPIO_REGMAP
> help
> Support for GPO(s) on ROHM BD71815 PMIC. There are two GPOs
> available on the ROHM PMIC.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71815.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71815.c
> index 08ff2857256f..a241c01e08d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71815.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71815.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -18,81 +19,33 @@
> #include <linux/mfd/rohm-bd71815.h>
>
> struct bd71815_gpio {
> - /* chip.parent points the MFD which provides DT node and regmap */
> - struct gpio_chip chip;
> - /* dev points to the platform device for devm and prints */
> struct device *dev;
> - struct regmap *regmap;
> };
>
> -static int bd71815gpo_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> -{
> - struct bd71815_gpio *bd71815 = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> - int ret, val;
> -
> - ret = regmap_read(bd71815->regmap, BD71815_REG_GPO, &val);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - return (val >> offset) & 1;
> -}
> -
> -static void bd71815gpo_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> - int value)
> -{
> - struct bd71815_gpio *bd71815 = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> - int ret, bit;
> -
> - bit = BIT(offset);
> -
> - if (value)
> - ret = regmap_set_bits(bd71815->regmap, BD71815_REG_GPO, bit);
> - else
> - ret = regmap_clear_bits(bd71815->regmap, BD71815_REG_GPO, bit);
> -
> - if (ret)
> - dev_warn(bd71815->dev, "failed to toggle GPO\n");
> -}
> -
> -static int bd71815_gpio_set_config(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> +static int bd71815_gpio_set_config(struct regmap *regmap, void *drvdata,
> + unsigned int offset,
> unsigned long config)
> {
> - struct bd71815_gpio *bdgpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> + struct bd71815_gpio *bdgpio = (struct bd71815_gpio *)drvdata;
>
> switch (pinconf_to_config_param(config)) {
> case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
> - return regmap_update_bits(bdgpio->regmap,
> + return regmap_update_bits(regmap,
> BD71815_REG_GPO,
> BD71815_GPIO_DRIVE_MASK << offset,
> BD71815_GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN << offset);
> case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
> - return regmap_update_bits(bdgpio->regmap,
> + return regmap_update_bits(regmap,
> BD71815_REG_GPO,
> BD71815_GPIO_DRIVE_MASK << offset,
> BD71815_GPIO_CMOS << offset);
> default:
> + dev_err(bdgpio->dev, "Unsupported config (0x%lx)\n", config);
> break;
> }
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
>
> -/* BD71815 GPIO is actually GPO */
> -static int bd71815gpo_direction_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
> -{
> - return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
> -}
> -
> -/* Template for GPIO chip */
> -static const struct gpio_chip bd71815gpo_chip = {
> - .label = "bd71815",
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> - .get = bd71815gpo_get,
> - .get_direction = bd71815gpo_direction_get,
> - .set = bd71815gpo_set,
> - .set_config = bd71815_gpio_set_config,
> - .can_sleep = true,
> -};
> -
> #define BD71815_TWO_GPIOS GENMASK(1, 0)
> #define BD71815_ONE_GPIO BIT(0)
>
> @@ -111,14 +64,16 @@ static const struct gpio_chip bd71815gpo_chip = {
> * but allows using it by providing the DT property
> * "rohm,enable-hidden-gpo".
> */
> -static int bd71815_init_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> +static int bd71815_init_valid_mask(struct regmap *regmap, void *drvdata,
> unsigned long *valid_mask,
> unsigned int ngpios)
> {
> + struct bd71815_gpio *bdgpio = (struct bd71815_gpio *)drvdata;
> +
> if (ngpios != 2)
> return 0;
>
> - if (gc->parent && device_property_present(gc->parent,
> + if (bdgpio->dev && device_property_present(bdgpio->dev->parent,
> "rohm,enable-hidden-gpo"))
> *valid_mask = BD71815_TWO_GPIOS;
> else
> @@ -127,9 +82,19 @@ static int bd71815_init_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Template for regmap gpio config */
> +static const struct gpio_regmap_config gpio_cfg_template = {
> + .label = "bd71815",
> + .reg_set_base = BD71815_REG_GPO,
> + .ngpio = 2,
> + .set_config = bd71815_gpio_set_config,
> + .init_valid_mask = bd71815_init_valid_mask,
> +};
> +
> static int gpo_bd71815_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct bd71815_gpio *g;
> + struct gpio_regmap_config cfg;
> struct device *parent, *dev;
>
> /*
> @@ -144,30 +109,15 @@ static int gpo_bd71815_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!g)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - g->chip = bd71815gpo_chip;
> -
> - /*
> - * FIXME: As writing of this the sysfs interface for GPIO control does
> - * not respect the valid_mask. Do not trust it but rather set the ngpios
> - * to 1 if "rohm,enable-hidden-gpo" is not given.
> - *
> - * This check can be removed later if the sysfs export is fixed and
> - * if the fix is backported.
> - *
> - * For now it is safest to just set the ngpios though.
> - */
> - if (device_property_present(parent, "rohm,enable-hidden-gpo"))
> - g->chip.ngpio = 2;
> - else
> - g->chip.ngpio = 1;
> -
> - g->chip.init_valid_mask = bd71815_init_valid_mask;
> - g->chip.base = -1;
> - g->chip.parent = parent;
> - g->regmap = dev_get_regmap(parent, NULL);
> g->dev = dev;
>
> - return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &g->chip, g);
> + cfg = gpio_cfg_template;
> + cfg.parent = parent;
> + cfg.regmap = dev_get_regmap(parent, NULL);
> + cfg.fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
> + cfg.drvdata = g;
> +
> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(devm_gpio_regmap_register(dev, &cfg));
> }
>
> static struct platform_driver gpo_bd71815_driver = {
> --
> 2.25.4
>
>
> --
> Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
> ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
> Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
> 90220 OULU
> FINLAND
>
> ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
> Simon says - in Latin please.
> ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~
> Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] gpio: bd71815: Use gpio-regmap
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] gpio: bd71815: Use gpio-regmap
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 13:12:13 +0300
- In-reply-to: <9b040b3610a50e8c3c9579f5d28713af5a59942c.1621577204.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
- References: <cover.1621577204.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com> <9b040b3610a50e8c3c9579f5d28713af5a59942c.1621577204.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v2 0/3] gpio: gpio-regmap: Support few custom operations
- From: Matti Vaittinen
- [PATCH v2 3/3] gpio: bd71815: Use gpio-regmap
- From: Matti Vaittinen
- [PATCH v2 0/3] gpio: gpio-regmap: Support few custom operations
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] gpio: gpio-regmap: Use devm_add_action()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio: regmap: Support few IC specific operations
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 3/3] gpio: bd71815: Use gpio-regmap
- Next by thread: [PATCH V4] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom-pmic-gpio: Convert qcom pmic gpio bindings to YAML
- Index(es):
 |