On 11 November 2010 16:01, Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@xxxxxx> wrote: > sorry for the delay, but I'm very busy at the moment. > I already pushed those patches forward to my -next branch and it should be > in the linux-next branch of today. > I'm still not happy with how GPIO or more precisely I2C on GPIO ports is > handled. But given that I don't have much time at the moment and that there > are more important things in viafb that require work and most important that > I don't see any opportunity/hardware to test whether the current (or an > alternative) implementation allows I2C devices work on port 2C pushing this > patch forward seems reasonable. I only removed the #ifdefs as you suggested > in your last email to make the code more readable. > The other two patches were good. Thanks! I'm open to testing new approaches if/when they appear. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
