Hi,
Daniel Drake schrieb:
On 29 October 2010 15:03, Daniel Drake <dsd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I now realise that all the #ifdefs are unnecessary, the code should be
there unconditionally and the compiler will remove it on non-OLPC
kernels.
The other option we have is to detect the XO-1.5 using DMI. That's the
more conventional way of detecting a specific platform in the kernel.
Florian, what do you think?
Bump
Florian, still hoping for your input on this, and a review of the S/R
infrastructure patches posted recently.
sorry for the delay, but I'm very busy at the moment.
I already pushed those patches forward to my -next branch and it should be in
the linux-next branch of today.
I'm still not happy with how GPIO or more precisely I2C on GPIO ports is
handled. But given that I don't have much time at the moment and that there are
more important things in viafb that require work and most important that I don't
see any opportunity/hardware to test whether the current (or an alternative)
implementation allows I2C devices work on port 2C pushing this patch forward
seems reasonable. I only removed the #ifdefs as you suggested in your last email
to make the code more readable.
The other two patches were good.
Thanks,
Florian Tobias Schandinat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
