On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:54:23 +0100 Daniel Drake <dsd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So I don't really like any of these solutions. I think we should > program this info from inside the kernel (like in my original patch, > although I'm open for nicer ways to do the same thing) Could you refresh my memory on that original patch? I guess we could put something into the via-core initialization that says: if (machine_is_olpc()) turn_02c_to_gpio(); That covers only your case, and not that of anybody else who will have wired up a board differently, but we can let them generalize it when they run into trouble :) Objections to that approach? jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
