Am Freitag, den 26.09.2008, 06:50 +0200 schrieb Markus Rechberger: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf > <dougsland@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:37:12 +0200 > > hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> > >> Who the hell is VDR User <user.vdr@xxxxxxxxx> ? > >> Klaus himself? > >> > >> At least he knows nothing about Mauro's real work on video4linux. > > > > Agreed. He's *totally lost* about Mauro's work. > > > >> To prepare the kernel sync and give the patchmonkey on Johannes' > >> request for dvb too, are only a very few percent of his work and the > >> "thanks" he had for this so far are it not worth at all ... > >> > >> On all other major projects, where he is the maintainer, such absurd > >> stuff did never happen. > >> > >> The dvb guys inside don't get their stuff together and do exclude each > >> other. At least Steve had no other choice than to come up with his own > >> solution. > > > > Definitely. > > > >> What a bullshit to accuse Mauro of missing maintainer ship, all asked > >> him to stay out as far as possible to continue to play there own > >> games! > > > > For sure, there are people here trying this every single day. > > Insted of spend time improving drivers they prefer attack Mauro and > > people that are working hard in their spare time. > > > >> But they just load the daily dirt on him they preferably don't like to > >> care themselves for at all, including patch reviewing in many parts. > >> > >> Also Mike did more integration work across the frameworks than anyone > >> else during the last year. That by the way. > > > > Agreed. > > > > the merge request has been pushed out for for Manu's code. > > I'm also dealing alot with DVB and related issues (eg. the i2c messup, > as for the cx88 based > devices pcmcia iomem reservation back then .. and many other issues > which went through other > subsystems). > > That there's no progress at the other sides is not true: > http://mcentral.de/hg/~mrec/em28xx-new/shortlog > > permanent development for the last couple of months. > All you could do there is to take out the usbids copy it to > linuxtv.org and play against all the people > who contributed to the other tree and which is manufacturer supported. > > I'd really better think twice if you want to keep up reverse > engineered drivers with linux which are capable > of melting devices (this happens with wrong configurations). > > Why am I interested in DVB? Because we have devices supporting > multiple standards which are yet > not directly supported by the DVB framework. > > The lies that I forked off the driver which I initially submitted to > linuxtv is ridiculous as you modified the wiki > site on linuxtv.org. See all that you and Mauro basically have done is > copying the code from mcentral.de > and trying to build up a second front against the manufacturer supported work. > > I'm seriously for a new Maintainer election here, let's see what will > come up during the next few days. > A new maintainer for dvb? Was there ever one ? It likely is the evilest swamp I can imagine. Who could be ever interested in such? YOU ? Be sure on video4linux we'll never discuss it ever again. Cheers, Hermann _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
