Am Dienstag, den 19.02.2008, 23:29 +0100 schrieb Patrick Boettcher: > Hi, > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Nicolas Will wrote: > >> I would suggest creating a netlink device which lircd (or similar) can > >> read from. > > > > Be ready to discount my opinion, I'm not too good at those things. > > > > Wouldn't going away from an event interface kill a possible direct link > > between the remote and X? > > > > The way I see it, LIRC is an additional layer that may be one too many > > in most cases. From my point of view, it is a relative pain I could do > > without. But I may have tunnel vision by lack of knowledge. > > I agree with you. I'm more looking for a solution with existing things. > LIRC is not in kernel. I don't think we should do something specific, new. > If there is nothing which can be done with the event system I think we > should either extend it or just drop this idea. > > What about HID? > > Patrick. > Hi, for what we have ir-common then already? Did not look in any details, but we have a hook there, also for RC5 remotes. Cheers, Hermann _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
