On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 23:29 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Nicolas Will wrote: > >> I would suggest creating a netlink device which lircd (or similar) > can > >> read from. > > > > Be ready to discount my opinion, I'm not too good at those things. > > > > Wouldn't going away from an event interface kill a possible direct > link > > between the remote and X? > > > > The way I see it, LIRC is an additional layer that may be one too > many > > in most cases. From my point of view, it is a relative pain I could > do > > without. But I may have tunnel vision by lack of knowledge. > > I agree with you. I'm more looking for a solution with existing > things. > LIRC is not in kernel. I don't think we should do something specific, > new. > If there is nothing which can be done with the event system I think > we > should either extend it or just drop this idea. > > What about HID? <ding> That's the sound I made when you've pushed me to the limit of my competencies and clever remarks... Others should jump in. Nico _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
