Hi, On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Nicolas Will wrote: >> I would suggest creating a netlink device which lircd (or similar) can >> read from. > > Be ready to discount my opinion, I'm not too good at those things. > > Wouldn't going away from an event interface kill a possible direct link > between the remote and X? > > The way I see it, LIRC is an additional layer that may be one too many > in most cases. From my point of view, it is a relative pain I could do > without. But I may have tunnel vision by lack of knowledge. I agree with you. I'm more looking for a solution with existing things. LIRC is not in kernel. I don't think we should do something specific, new. If there is nothing which can be done with the event system I think we should either extend it or just drop this idea. What about HID? Patrick. -- Mail: patrick.boettcher@xxxxxxx WWW: http://www.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pboettch/ _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
