David Santinoli wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 12:28:52AM +0100, Luca Olivetti wrote: >> Besides, one shouldn't have more or less rights to have an own mail >> server depending on the fact that the address is static or dynamic. > > Please get real. While you have all the right to choose to run a mail > server on a dynamic IP address, you cannot force your policy on the > recipients. yes, we can. and we will. every company doing lawful business by mail will suffer from the law consequences of such blocking. that's real. use this "dynIP mailhost- advantage" recklessly and win unrelated cases at court against every opponent :] sorry, but discrimination always makes me finding ways to hit back. > Considering that the overwhelming majority of the SMTP > connections from dynamic addresses are originated by spambots, it is > perfectly advisable to refuse mail from such servers, as any sensible > mail administrator knows. "sensible" or just too much the costs to do *real* spam filtering? and Luca is right, lets blacklist all U.S. :D > > Cheers, > David y tom _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
