Kenneth Aafl?y wrote: > On Saturday 02 April 2005 00:01, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > >>Manu Abraham wrote: >> >>>Eventhough the very first version of ca_zap (not the one that i sent you >>>recently, but the one i sent you long back maybe a few months back, i >>>think around November/December) was based on mpsys and was not too happy >>>due to the generated code. >>> >>>Since i have changed ca_zap's dependency from mpsys, i don't have to >>>worry about that aspect anymore. >>> >>>What i would prefer is since it has been quite some work on libsi (which >>>is very small), That could go ahead.. >> >>It depends on where the development is going. IMHO ca_zap should >>stay a small tool similar to szap, so if it works now with libsi, >>why would you want to change that? >>OTOH if you (or someone else) wants to write a larger dvb library, >>then why reimplement all of SI parsing if there are exisiting libs for it? >>(I don't know if mpsys is good, haven't looked at it in detail.) > > > I was under impression that this is the libsi that is already out there, > it is not? > No it was factored out from ca_zap, it is not out there yet .. Manu
