On Saturday 02 April 2005 00:01, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > Manu Abraham wrote: > > Eventhough the very first version of ca_zap (not the one that i sent you > > recently, but the one i sent you long back maybe a few months back, i > > think around November/December) was based on mpsys and was not too happy > > due to the generated code. > > > > Since i have changed ca_zap's dependency from mpsys, i don't have to > > worry about that aspect anymore. > > > > What i would prefer is since it has been quite some work on libsi (which > > is very small), That could go ahead.. > > It depends on where the development is going. IMHO ca_zap should > stay a small tool similar to szap, so if it works now with libsi, > why would you want to change that? > OTOH if you (or someone else) wants to write a larger dvb library, > then why reimplement all of SI parsing if there are exisiting libs for it? > (I don't know if mpsys is good, haven't looked at it in detail.) I was under impression that this is the libsi that is already out there, it is not? Kenneth
