Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > Manu Abraham wrote: > >>Eventhough the very first version of ca_zap (not the one that i sent you >>recently, but the one i sent you long back maybe a few months back, i >>think around November/December) was based on mpsys and was not too happy >>due to the generated code. >> >>Since i have changed ca_zap's dependency from mpsys, i don't have to >>worry about that aspect anymore. >> >>What i would prefer is since it has been quite some work on libsi (which >>is very small), That could go ahead.. > > > It depends on where the development is going. IMHO ca_zap should > stay a small tool similar to szap, so if it works now with libsi, > why would you want to change that? The question that was raised by Dominique was that he would like to to replace (libsi) the factored out code from ca_zap, with mpsys.. > OTOH if you (or someone else) wants to write a larger dvb library, > then why reimplement all of SI parsing if there are exisiting libs for it? Not implementing all of SI parsing, but only selected areas where it requires.. Currently ca_zap requires a PAT/PMT parser, that's what libsi does.. Manu
