Re: and that would be it for kerneldoc fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, Rob Landley wrote:

> On 08/30/2012 05:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Rob Landley wrote:
> >
> >> (Something I didn't quite cover in there was why wikis are less help
> >> than you'd think. Wikis are great at holding a slush pile, but suck
> >> at indexing it. Wikipedia can't tell a story, the closest you get is
> >> tvtropes.com.)
> >
> >   agreed -- wikis are disastrously bad for *official* docs.  but for
> > now, i started a new wiki page for just keeping track of stuff until
> > we figure out where to put it:
> >
> > http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Kernel_Documentation
>
> Who's "we", kemosabe?

  sorry, that was meant to be the non-royal "we" -- as in, whoever
makes those decisions.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux