Re: and that would be it for kerneldoc fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Rob Landley wrote:

> On 08/26/2012 07:31 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> >   i hope these were in acceptable format and while i understand
> > it's a bit late in the cycle to try to add doc fixes, it would be
> > just ducky if these could be pushed since they clearly don't
> > affect functionality and will get rid of a *pile* of annoying
> > warnings.
>
> I'll see what I can do,

  at this point, i've either submitted patches for stuff that
generates warnings, or sent private emails to the people responsible
for the kerneldoc content that does, so almost all of the warnings
have been "addressed" in some way; now to wait while the fixes trickle
in.

  i apologize for my sudden obsession in cleaning this stuff up, but i
really want to promote some of these docs to my students and i want to
minimize the annoying warnings they have to see.

  onward...

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux