* Herbert Xu | 2007-10-05 22:20:22 [+0800]: >On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 03:50:56PM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote: >> >> I did not find a module_mutex. We hold a readlock of crypto_alg_sem >> within the crypto subsystem and request_module() increments >> kmod_concurrent (which may not exceed a certain limit). > >However, it's still good to remove this code since doing a nested >modprobe of "sha" within a modprobe of "sha" just feels wrong. Yes it feels wrong. It even may show that the fallback is not available if padlock is loaded before the generic ones. Sebastian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
