On 2008/05/27 22:46 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: > Daisuke Nishimura wrote: >> On 2008/05/27 22:18 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: >>> Daisuke Nishimura wrote: >>>> On 2008/05/27 16:42 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: >>>>> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >>>>>> hi, >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for looking into this. Yamamoto-San is also looking into a swap >>>>>>>> controller. Is there a consensus on the approach? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not yet, but I think we should have some consensus each other >>>>>>> before going further. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Daisuke Nishimura. >>>>>> while nishimura-san's one still seems to have a lot of todo, >>>>>> it seems good enough as a start point to me. >>>>>> so i'd like to withdraw mine. >>>>>> >>>>>> nishimura-san, is it ok for you? >>>>>> >>>> Of cource. >>>> I'll work hard to make it better. >>>> >>>>> I would suggest that me merge the good parts from both into the swap controller. >>>>> Having said that I'll let the two of you decide on what the good aspects of both >>>>> are. I cannot see any immediate overlap, but there might be some w.r.t. >>>>> infrastructure used. >>>>> >>>> Well, you mean you'll make another patch based on yamamoto-san's >>>> and mine? >>>> >>>> Basically, I think it's difficult to merge >>>> because we charge different objects. >>>> >>> Yes, I know - that's why I said infrastructure, to see the grouping and common >>> data structure aspects. I'll try and review the code. >>> >> OK. >> >> I'll wait for your patch. > > Hi, Daisuke-San > > I am not sending out any patch (sorry for the confusion, if I caused it). I am > going to review the swapcgroup patchset. > No problem :-) I would very appreciate it if you review swap cgroup patches. I'll update my patches based on your and others' comments. Thanks, Daisuke Nishimura. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers