On 2008/05/27 22:18 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: > Daisuke Nishimura wrote: >> On 2008/05/27 16:42 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: >>> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >>>> hi, >>>> >>>>>> Thanks for looking into this. Yamamoto-San is also looking into a swap >>>>>> controller. Is there a consensus on the approach? >>>>>> >>>>> Not yet, but I think we should have some consensus each other >>>>> before going further. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Daisuke Nishimura. >>>> while nishimura-san's one still seems to have a lot of todo, >>>> it seems good enough as a start point to me. >>>> so i'd like to withdraw mine. >>>> >>>> nishimura-san, is it ok for you? >>>> >> Of cource. >> I'll work hard to make it better. >> >>> I would suggest that me merge the good parts from both into the swap controller. >>> Having said that I'll let the two of you decide on what the good aspects of both >>> are. I cannot see any immediate overlap, but there might be some w.r.t. >>> infrastructure used. >>> >> Well, you mean you'll make another patch based on yamamoto-san's >> and mine? >> >> Basically, I think it's difficult to merge >> because we charge different objects. >> > > Yes, I know - that's why I said infrastructure, to see the grouping and common > data structure aspects. I'll try and review the code. > OK. I'll wait for your patch. Thanks, Daisuke Nishimura. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers