Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > On 2008/05/27 16:42 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: >> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >>> hi, >>> >>>>> Thanks for looking into this. Yamamoto-San is also looking into a swap >>>>> controller. Is there a consensus on the approach? >>>>> >>>> Not yet, but I think we should have some consensus each other >>>> before going further. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Daisuke Nishimura. >>> while nishimura-san's one still seems to have a lot of todo, >>> it seems good enough as a start point to me. >>> so i'd like to withdraw mine. >>> >>> nishimura-san, is it ok for you? >>> > Of cource. > I'll work hard to make it better. > >> I would suggest that me merge the good parts from both into the swap controller. >> Having said that I'll let the two of you decide on what the good aspects of both >> are. I cannot see any immediate overlap, but there might be some w.r.t. >> infrastructure used. >> > Well, you mean you'll make another patch based on yamamoto-san's > and mine? > > Basically, I think it's difficult to merge > because we charge different objects. > Yes, I know - that's why I said infrastructure, to see the grouping and common data structure aspects. I'll try and review the code. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers