Hi. On 2008/05/23 6:27 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: > Daisuke Nishimura wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I updated my swapcgroup patch. >> >> Major changes from previous version(*1): >> - Rebased on 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 + KAMEZAWA-san's performance >> improvement patchset v4. >> - Implemented as a add-on to memory cgroup. >> So, there is no need to add a new member to page_cgroup now. >> - (NEW)Modified vm_swap_full() to calculate the rate of >> swap usage per cgroup. >> >> Patchs: >> - [1/4] add cgroup files >> - [2/4] add member to swap_info_struct for cgroup >> - [3/4] implement charge/uncharge >> - [4/4] modify vm_swap_full for cgroup >> >> ToDo: >> - handle force_empty. >> - make it possible for users to select if they use >> this feature or not, and avoid overhead for users >> not using this feature. >> - move charges along with task move between cgroups. >> > > Thanks for looking into this. Yamamoto-San is also looking into a swap > controller. Is there a consensus on the approach? > Not yet, but I think we should have some consensus each other before going further. Thanks, Daisuke Nishimura. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
