Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > Hi. > > I updated my swapcgroup patch. > > Major changes from previous version(*1): > - Rebased on 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 + KAMEZAWA-san's performance > improvement patchset v4. > - Implemented as a add-on to memory cgroup. > So, there is no need to add a new member to page_cgroup now. > - (NEW)Modified vm_swap_full() to calculate the rate of > swap usage per cgroup. > > Patchs: > - [1/4] add cgroup files > - [2/4] add member to swap_info_struct for cgroup > - [3/4] implement charge/uncharge > - [4/4] modify vm_swap_full for cgroup > > ToDo: > - handle force_empty. > - make it possible for users to select if they use > this feature or not, and avoid overhead for users > not using this feature. > - move charges along with task move between cgroups. > Thanks for looking into this. Yamamoto-San is also looking into a swap controller. Is there a consensus on the approach? -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers