Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > On 2008/05/27 22:18 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: >> Daisuke Nishimura wrote: >>> On 2008/05/27 16:42 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: >>>> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >>>>> hi, >>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for looking into this. Yamamoto-San is also looking into a swap >>>>>>> controller. Is there a consensus on the approach? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Not yet, but I think we should have some consensus each other >>>>>> before going further. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Daisuke Nishimura. >>>>> while nishimura-san's one still seems to have a lot of todo, >>>>> it seems good enough as a start point to me. >>>>> so i'd like to withdraw mine. >>>>> >>>>> nishimura-san, is it ok for you? >>>>> >>> Of cource. >>> I'll work hard to make it better. >>> >>>> I would suggest that me merge the good parts from both into the swap controller. >>>> Having said that I'll let the two of you decide on what the good aspects of both >>>> are. I cannot see any immediate overlap, but there might be some w.r.t. >>>> infrastructure used. >>>> >>> Well, you mean you'll make another patch based on yamamoto-san's >>> and mine? >>> >>> Basically, I think it's difficult to merge >>> because we charge different objects. >>> >> Yes, I know - that's why I said infrastructure, to see the grouping and common >> data structure aspects. I'll try and review the code. >> > OK. > > I'll wait for your patch. Hi, Daisuke-San I am not sending out any patch (sorry for the confusion, if I caused it). I am going to review the swapcgroup patchset. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers