Hi Marc, On 02/03/20 1:46 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote: > Marc, > > On 26/02/20 2:40 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> On 21/02/20 2:01 pm, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>> On 2/21/20 9:31 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote: >>>> Hi Rob, >>>> >>>> On 20/02/20 2:05 am, Rob Herring wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 07:58:34PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote: >>>>>> Some CAN transceivers have a standby line that needs to be asserted >>>>>> before they can be used. Model this GPIO lines as an optional >>>>>> fixed-regulator node. Document bindings for the same. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt | 3 +++ >>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> This has moved to DT schema in my tree, so please adjust it and resend. >>>> >>>> Ok. >>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt >>>>>> index ed614383af9c..f17e2a5207dc 100644 >>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt >>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt >>>>>> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ Optional Subnode: >>>>>> that can be used for CAN/CAN-FD modes. See >>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/can-transceiver.txt >>>>>> for details. >>>>>> + >>>>>> +- xceiver-supply: Regulator that powers the CAN transceiver. >>>>> >>>>> The supply for a transceiver should go in the transceiver node. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Marc, while I have you here, do you agree with this? >>> >>> I'll look into the details later today. >>> >> >> Sure. Be sure to take another look at my attempt to use the transceiver >> with a phy driver some time ago. >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1006238/ >> > > Do you have any comments? > Gentle ping. Thanks, Faiz
