Marc, On 26/02/20 2:40 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 21/02/20 2:01 pm, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 2/21/20 9:31 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote: >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> On 20/02/20 2:05 am, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 07:58:34PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote: >>>>> Some CAN transceivers have a standby line that needs to be asserted >>>>> before they can be used. Model this GPIO lines as an optional >>>>> fixed-regulator node. Document bindings for the same. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt | 3 +++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> This has moved to DT schema in my tree, so please adjust it and resend. >>> >>> Ok. >>>> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt >>>>> index ed614383af9c..f17e2a5207dc 100644 >>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt >>>>> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ Optional Subnode: >>>>> that can be used for CAN/CAN-FD modes. See >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/can-transceiver.txt >>>>> for details. >>>>> + >>>>> +- xceiver-supply: Regulator that powers the CAN transceiver. >>>> >>>> The supply for a transceiver should go in the transceiver node. >>>> >>> >>> Marc, while I have you here, do you agree with this? >> >> I'll look into the details later today. >> > > Sure. Be sure to take another look at my attempt to use the transceiver > with a phy driver some time ago. > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1006238/ > Do you have any comments? Thanks, Faiz
