On 2/21/20 9:31 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 20/02/20 2:05 am, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 07:58:34PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote: >>> Some CAN transceivers have a standby line that needs to be asserted >>> before they can be used. Model this GPIO lines as an optional >>> fixed-regulator node. Document bindings for the same. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt | 3 +++ >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> This has moved to DT schema in my tree, so please adjust it and resend. > > Ok. >> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt >>> index ed614383af9c..f17e2a5207dc 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt >>> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ Optional Subnode: >>> that can be used for CAN/CAN-FD modes. See >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/can-transceiver.txt >>> for details. >>> + >>> +- xceiver-supply: Regulator that powers the CAN transceiver. >> >> The supply for a transceiver should go in the transceiver node. >> > > Marc, while I have you here, do you agree with this? I'll look into the details later today. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
