Hi Marcel, On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Nick Pelly <npelly@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Ville Tervo <ville.tervo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Nick Pelly wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Attached is a new patch with the consistent bit logic. >>>>> >>>>> Comments? >>>> >>>> In order to keep backwards compatibility 1 should mean "don't allow this >>>> packet type" for all packets. Other wise old application with new kernel >>>> would not allow any packet types. >>> >>> The current patch achieves this backwards compatibility by assuming >>> that all packet types are allowed if the old sockaddr_sco struct is >>> used (it checks the size), or if sco_pkt_type is 0. >> >> OK. Then my concerns are gone. > > As best I can tell there are no objections. We're going ahead with this patch. > > http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/common.git;a=commit;h=3b077241e02041b1f03fee912896b8de1d7ac096 > > Nick Is this patch (or something similar) being considered for merging into the bluetooth-2.6 tree. We are experiencing similar issues with these and other car kits. Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
