Re: Re: Intel HDA and Jack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/17/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It's probably a sound driver bug.  This HDA intel crap is really getting
to be a nightmare.  It seems like sound is broken on every other new
laptop.

Strange, Intel is no nice with OSS video drivers..


Can you try the -rt kernel and enable latency tracing?


You mean compile a custom kernel? Sure, I'll get back once I've tried it.

Does it make any difference if you boot with ACPI disabled?

No apparent change.


Check /proc/interrupts for your soundcard - when you launch JACK in
realtime mode does the interrupt count increase?


I *think* so, I'm not sure what the format of /proc/interrupts is.
Here's what I saw:

*jack not started*
11:        852           XT-PIC  uhci_hcd:usb2, HDA Intel
*started jack*
11:       1010          XT-PIC  uhci_hcd:usb2, HDA Intel
11:       1106          XT-PIC  uhci_hcd:usb2, HDA Intel
11:       1325          XT-PIC  uhci_hcd:usb2, HDA Intel
11:       1537          XT-PIC  uhci_hcd:usb2, HDA Intel
11:       1591          XT-PIC  uhci_hcd:usb2, HDA Intel
*jack crashed*
11:       1591          XT-PIC  uhci_hcd:usb2, HDA Intel

Alright, I'll go try a custom kernel. Ugh, I was really hoping I could
go with packaged kernels.

Lee

> Thanks!
>
> On 6/17/06, Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 6/14/06, I. E. Smith-Heisters <public@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Okay, looked at it some more. When RT is enabled, jack just locks up
> > > and the watchdog terminates the process, regardless of the buffer
> > > size. When RT is disabled the xruns are allowed to continue, and the
> > > number of xruns decreases with a higher buffer size (but never go
> > > below about 10/second). There's no evidence that RT mode has failed to
> > > be set. This is all as root.
> > >
> > > I am using the proprietary NVIDIA drivers, as gotten from the Ubuntu
> > > repositories. I would be surprised if this had anything to do with it
> > > though, since direct alsa works fine with the same xOrg drivers.
> > > Unless, of course, there's some software conflict between the video
> > > drivers and jack itself (as opposed to there being a hardware-level
> > > conflict).
> >
> > It would not surprise me for the proprietary drivers to behave in
> > a non-realtime-safe manner.  This would affect JACK much worse
> > than some heavily-buffered ALSA application.
> >
> > Can you try it with the open source driver to compare?
> > --
> >  joq
> >
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux