On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 19:46 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:27 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > > On 02/04/2015 05:14 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:05 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > > > > On 02/03/2015 10:42 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 15:50 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig > > > > > > index bf1295e..115348c 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig > > > > > > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ if SPMI > > > > > > > > > > > > config SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB > > > > > > tristate "Qualcomm MSM SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter)" > > > > > > - depends on ARM > > > > > > + depends on ARM || ARM64 > > > > > > depends on IRQ_DOMAIN > > > > > > depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST > > > > > > default ARCH_QCOM > > > > > > > > > > But only if COMPILE_TEST is set too, isn't it? Is that intended? > > > > > > > > No, the driver will be used on arm64 qcom platforms, also. > > > > > > But ARCH_QCOM currently is (32 bit) arch/arm only, isn't it? > > > > Currently yes, but we want to be prepared to support PMIC's which will > > be used on arm64 platforms, although they are not upstream yet. > > Please make the commit summary reflect that, as in: > "spmi: pmic_arb: enable test build on arm64" > > Commit explanation likewise. What if we just drop ARM dependency? Regards, Ivan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
