On 02/23/2015 02:57 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 19:46 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: >> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:27 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: >>> On 02/04/2015 05:14 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:05 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: >>>>> On 02/03/2015 10:42 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 15:50 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig >>>>>>> index bf1295e..115348c 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig >>>>>>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ if SPMI >>>>>>> >>>>>>> config SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB >>>>>>> tristate "Qualcomm MSM SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter)" >>>>>>> - depends on ARM >>>>>>> + depends on ARM || ARM64 >>>>>>> depends on IRQ_DOMAIN >>>>>>> depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST >>>>>>> default ARCH_QCOM >>>>>> >>>>>> But only if COMPILE_TEST is set too, isn't it? Is that intended? >>>>> >>>>> No, the driver will be used on arm64 qcom platforms, also. >>>> >>>> But ARCH_QCOM currently is (32 bit) arch/arm only, isn't it? >>> >>> Currently yes, but we want to be prepared to support PMIC's which will >>> be used on arm64 platforms, although they are not upstream yet. >> >> Please make the commit summary reflect that, as in: >> "spmi: pmic_arb: enable test build on arm64" >> >> Commit explanation likewise. > > What if we just drop ARM dependency? I'm fine with this, Paul? -- regards, Stan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
