On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:27 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> On 02/04/2015 05:14 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:05 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> >> On 02/03/2015 10:42 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 15:50 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> >>>> index bf1295e..115348c 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> >>>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ if SPMI
> >>>>
> >>>> config SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB
> >>>> tristate "Qualcomm MSM SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter)"
> >>>> - depends on ARM
> >>>> + depends on ARM || ARM64
> >>>> depends on IRQ_DOMAIN
> >>>> depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
> >>>> default ARCH_QCOM
> >>>
> >>> But only if COMPILE_TEST is set too, isn't it? Is that intended?
> >>
> >> No, the driver will be used on arm64 qcom platforms, also.
> >
> > But ARCH_QCOM currently is (32 bit) arch/arm only, isn't it?
>
> Currently yes, but we want to be prepared to support PMIC's which will
> be used on arm64 platforms, although they are not upstream yet.
Please make the commit summary reflect that, as in:
"spmi: pmic_arb: enable test build on arm64"
Commit explanation likewise.
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
