On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 09:31:54 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Cc'ing Thomas, > > On 8 July 2014 10:20, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 4 July 2014 09:51, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Yeah, having something like what you suggested from DT is the perfect > >> solution to get over this. The only reason why I am not touching that here > >> is to not delay other patches just because of that. > >> > >> There are separate threads going on for that and probably somebody > >> else was trying to push for that. > >> > >> That's it, nothing more. I would definitely like to use those bindings instead > >> of the crazy routines we are trying here, once that is finalized :) > > > > Do we have some kind of agreement for this temporary solution? Anyways > > I will kick the other thread again to resolve the bindings soon. > > Hi Mike/Rafael, > > Thomas has a dependency on the patch adding "find_siblings()": > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg348080.html > > Would it be fine to get this temporary solution (Only within cpufreq-cpu0 > file, so that it doesn't become an API) for now and updating it later once > bindings are closed? I don't like that idea, but I wonder what other people think. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
