On 4 July 2014 09:51, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah, having something like what you suggested from DT is the perfect > solution to get over this. The only reason why I am not touching that here > is to not delay other patches just because of that. > > There are separate threads going on for that and probably somebody > else was trying to push for that. > > That's it, nothing more. I would definitely like to use those bindings instead > of the crazy routines we are trying here, once that is finalized :) Do we have some kind of agreement for this temporary solution? Anyways I will kick the other thread again to resolve the bindings soon. @Stephen: Do you still want find_rate_changer() stuff in this series only and or this can go into 3.17 without anymore changes and lets finalize the bindings Mike suggested and then update this code? -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
