Cc'ing Thomas, On 8 July 2014 10:20, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 4 July 2014 09:51, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Yeah, having something like what you suggested from DT is the perfect >> solution to get over this. The only reason why I am not touching that here >> is to not delay other patches just because of that. >> >> There are separate threads going on for that and probably somebody >> else was trying to push for that. >> >> That's it, nothing more. I would definitely like to use those bindings instead >> of the crazy routines we are trying here, once that is finalized :) > > Do we have some kind of agreement for this temporary solution? Anyways > I will kick the other thread again to resolve the bindings soon. Hi Mike/Rafael, Thomas has a dependency on the patch adding "find_siblings()": http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg348080.html Would it be fine to get this temporary solution (Only within cpufreq-cpu0 file, so that it doesn't become an API) for now and updating it later once bindings are closed? I have tried pinging on the other thread as well, but no one replied. And it looks those bindings are going to take some time to settle. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
