On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 2:38 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I'm definitely in favor of consolidation instead of renaming to > > gpiod_go_set_debounce(). If anything a better name would be: > > gpiod_set_debounce_nocheck() to indicate the actual functionality. > > > > How about first extending gpio_set_config_with_argument() to take a > > boolean "optional" argument and removing > > gpio_set_config_with_argument_optional() altogether? Both are internal > > to drivers/gpio/ so it would have no effect on consumers. > > Consider this series as a report then, I am not going to spend time on it. > Thank you for the review. > No worries. I applied patch 1/3. 3/3 doesn't apply on its own so feel free to resend it if you still want it. Bartosz
