On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:18:04AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 06:00:33PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > In order to reduce the 'gpio' namespace when operate over GPIO descriptor
> > rename gpio_set_debounce_timeout() to gpiod_do_set_debounce().
>
> To me anything that has '_do_' in their name sounds like an internal static
> function that gets wrapped by the actual API function(s).
>
> For instance it could be
>
> int gpio_set_debounce_timeout()
> {
> ...
> gpiod_do_set_debounce()
> ...
>
> However, gpiod_set_debounce_timeout() or gpiod_set_debounce() sounds good
> to me.
Then please propose the second name for gpiod_set_config_XXX to follow
the same pattern. The series unifies naming and reduces the current
inconsistency.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
