Should I assume my modem will simply never work on GNU/Linux?
2011/1/25 Fibonacci Prower <fibonacci.prower@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Update: By lifting the handset I can hear the number being dialled,
> and the usual response. It is in the middle of that response that I
> get the NO CARRIER error message.
> Apparently, upon encountering that the modem does NOT hang up, but
> tries to dial again, causing the NO DIALTONE error. But still, why am
> I receiving the NO CARRIER error?
>
> 2011/1/24 Jacques Goldberg <Jacques.Goldberg@xxxxxxx>:
>> First of all thank you very much for correcting $HOME/.wvdial.conf
>> missing the leading dot before wv
>>
>>
>> I am not sure it is a good idea for me to creep into your case which is
>> already complicated. But you say that you do not know how to edit
>> wvdial.conf I assume that you mean that you do not know WHAT TO ADD,DELETE
>> OR CHANGE, not how to use a text editor. Perhaps the best way to help you is
>> to ask you to:
>> 1-while we work together, always use only wvdial, not gnome-ppp
>> 2-start your driver (tell us which driver: browsing back all the mails takes
>> a lot of time) AND DO NOT STOP IT UNTIL THE END OF THE TEST. Do all the rest
>> in a window which is not the one used to start the driver
>> 3-delete the current file /etc/wvdial.conf
>> 4-run sudo wvdialconf and verify that the modem has been detected (a
>> message saying a modem like ttySsomething has been detected).
>> 5-with any text editor edit the new file /etc/wvdial.conf with the following
>> changes ONLY:
>> -remove the leading ; (semicolon) before Username Password and Phone
>> -remove the characters < and > in those three lines
>> -replace the word which was between < and > by the value given to you by
>> your Internet provider
>> -Add the line
>> Carrier Check = no if not already there (usually absent with
>> wvdial-1.60) or remove the leading semicolon if the line is there with a
>> semicolon
>> -DO NOT ADD OR CHANGE OR DELETE ANYTHING ELSE.
>> 6-start wvdial
>> 7-send us the screen outputs of wvdialconf and of wvdial
>> 8-send us the file /etc/wvdial.conf AFTER HAVING CHANGED THE TRUE PASSWORD
>> TO XXXXXXXX IN ORDER NOT TO REVEAL IT TO ANYBODY.
>>
>> This may look to you as being a regression from your current status.It is
>> not.
>> In one of your mails I collected the following few lines:
>>
>> --> Sending: ATZ
>> ATZ
>> OK
>> --> Sending: ATQ0 V1 E1 S0=0&C1&D2 +FCLASS=0
>> ATQ0 V1 E1 S0=0&C1&D2 +FCLASS=0
>> OK
>> --> Modem initialized.
>> --> Sending: ATM1L3DT019479472323
>> --> Waiting for carrier.
>> ATM1L3DT019479472323
>>
>> I do not believe that the following AT commands (so called Hayes commands)
>> were generated by wvdialconf:
>> Q0 V1 E1 S0=0 &C1 &D2 +FCLASS=0 M1 L3
>>
>> The drivers which you are trying to use do not support voice nor sound or
>> FAX. Worse, commands such as &C1 &D2 control how the modem handles
>> (including ignores) the carrier signal. I do not pretend to sufficiently
>> know wvdial to be able to state which has priority, carrier control defined
>> in an initialization string or in a wvdial.conf control statement.
>> Furthermore the values given to &C1 and &D2 (and some others) are MODEM
>> MANUFACTURER DEPENDENT. So I cannot exclude the possibility that these added
>> initialization strings destroy what you rightly defined using a wvdial.conf
>> statement such as Carrier Check.
>> M1 and L3 control the way the speaker built in the modem works and the
>> volume. Your driver is anyway not sound-capable. +FCLASS controls the FAX. I
>> am not in the position to stte that the authors of the drivers have verified
>> that their software is transparent to playing with the control of
>> unsupported features.
>>
>> So you see, my point is : do not add parameters to the strings until after
>> you have made your modem work. You can play later in a controlled
>> environment, but debugging time is not the right time for that.
>>
>> I have deleted the embedded copy of the thread, anyway archived, to save
>> bandwidth
>> Also please do not add CC to me, one copy sent to discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx is
>> sufficient.
>
> The same goes for me.
>
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> $0='!/msfQ0yjoV!fe!sfldbi!psup!pmpT'x19xor print+map{("\e[7m \e[0m",
> chr ord(chop$0)-1)[$_].("\n")[++$i%72]}split//,unpack'B*',pack'H*',(
> $P='F'x18)."8186078739E1F0F0E19FCF333319CCE6667383CF0733099E67E7F39"
> ."FCF3333218067E7F39FCF3333319E6666739F860787399E70F0E1$P"#Perl rulz
>
--
$0='!/msfQ0yjoV!fe!sfldbi!psup!pmpT'x19xor print+map{("\e[7m \e[0m",
chr ord(chop$0)-1)[$_].("\n")[++$i%72]}split//,unpack'B*',pack'H*',(
$P='F'x18)."8186078739E1F0F0E19FCF333319CCE6667383CF0733099E67E7F39"
."FCF3333218067E7F39FCF3333319E6666739F860787399E70F0E1$P"#Perl rulz
