Re: 'martian' working, many thanks; now how to PPP on F13?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 On 09/12/2010 09:06 AM, Jacques Goldberg wrote:
 Sorry to disappoint you Jonathan


The rate reported by wvdialconf is not the transmission rate! It is (supposedly, never checked, irrelevant) the rate at which the software communicates with the serial connection to the modem chip located in the PC. You will see the true rate when you launch a wvdial command. wvdial will report the word "CONNECTED" and the rate, and it will never reach the theoretical 56kbauds limit.
Gotcha.

Just to tease you, though, I am currently working flawless with a serial connection at 460,800 bauds. But not the way you think of. I use a Xilinx Spartan 3AN FPGA development board as a data acquisition system. It has an RS232 port which can go even at least twice faster than 460,800. I have connected it to a 10-15$ RS232-to-USB adapter with a shielded cable 20cm long only or it won't work, and the USB side of the adaptor is connected to my laptop with a 40cm shielded USB cable or it will not work. Actually while pushing the above to its limits to match the data acquisition system specifications, I "discovered" that the 115200 bauds limit which everybody knows about is just what was set in the initial version of National Semiconductors's 16550. There are more recent versions of this chip which could easily work at 800 kbauds but they cost 1 or 2 dollars more per piece, a tremendous saving for PC manufacturers.
This is quite interesting to me. About three years ago I was asked to try to replace the server of an old multi-user system; all I was told was that the server was running Windows 95. I found some hardware with Windows 98 drivers available, ghosted the hard drive to the new hardware, and completed a Windows 98 in-place upgrade. And then when I ran the server binary, I was in for a shock.

It was DOS-based, not Windows-based. Last updated in 1984. Clearly trying to use COM1: in an RS-483 mode. Deep memories in dark storage opened up, a book I had half-memorized in 1986; RS-483 was a standard serial-port mode then, the book described RS-232/RS-422 of that time. I looked at the remaining bits of the old server -- someone had attempted to work it before me -- and found just a basic ISA 16550A board, nothing unusual at all.

The server process had been running successfully in a DOS shell under Windows 95 for at least ten years, so I figured maybe Windows 98 might be OK too. It had to also cooperate on a 10based2 Windows 2003 network, so I didn't want to try to take it to FreeDOS, which I might have otherwise. The big catch, though, was the Dell hardware I had found to rebuild it all on, had no discrete 165**0* chips at all; its serial ports must have been part of larger multifunction chips. But to sum it up, it did work, and very well. The most interesting thing is, when I later looked up RS-483, I learned that it is still in use to synchronize many large-arena PA systems...and that it can communicate up to 1 Mbps. I wonder what kind of cable is needed for the latter.

J.E.B.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Development]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Fedora Women]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux