Hello Mike,
On 3/4/23 13:45, Xisco Fauli wrote:
Hello,
On 1/4/23 16:00, Mike Kaganski wrote:
On 01.04.2023 16:45, Mike Kaganski wrote:
2. I believe we can just have *major* releases, without point
releases. I.e., 3.3.0.4; 3.4.0.1; 3.5.0.3; 3.6.0.4; 4.0.0.0.beta1; ...
Because when we bibisect, we do it to do the following bisection in
the specific repo; so the branch point is the only interesting
thing. 3.3.1.2 is not useful for the bibisect; and avoiding these
could possibly keep some space.
... And then, maybe we would be able to keep the extensions? Because
removal of those prevents one from bisecting, say, problems in
solvers, or in grammar checking.
I tried to create a new repo without removing the extensions and it's
24 Gbs after git gc --agressive ( 130 commits ) so I don't think it's
worth it to add the extensions...
After a second thought I realized it's possible to keep the extensions
while keeping a reasonable repository size if all languages but en-US
are removed from the build [1]. Same as in the linux repository.
I've re-uploaded the repository again to
https://bibisect.libreoffice.org/win86-releases containing all 3.x, 4.x
and 5.x releases. 6.x and 7.x releases will be added soon.
Regards
[1]
https://git.libreoffice.org/dev-tools/+/56adf00a6b154ece03ec0f6ee41390dbe35647bb%5E%21/
--
Xisco Faulí
LibreOffice QA Team
IRC: x1sc0
