Hello,
On 1/4/23 15:45, Mike Kaganski wrote:
Hi!
On 31.03.2023 20:50, Xisco Fauli wrote:
I recreated the bisect repository from scratch and reuploaded it to
https://bibisect.libreoffice.org/win86-releases again.
So far it contains the 3.x and 4.x releases and next week I'll add
the remaining releases.
Trying the repo :)
1. 'git checkout oldest' tells me that 'error: pathspec 'oldest' did
not match any file(s) known to git'. I see that each checkout has own
name following the version; but having the familiar 'oldest' defined
for the repo would allow to 'git bisect start master oldest', without
remembering this bibisect repo specifics.
Yes, I forgot to add it. Good point
2. I believe we can just have *major* releases, without point
releases. I.e., 3.3.0.4; 3.4.0.1; 3.5.0.3; 3.6.0.4; 4.0.0.0.beta1; ...
Because when we bibisect, we do it to do the following bisection in
the specific repo; so the branch point is the only interesting thing.
3.3.1.2 is not useful for the bibisect; and avoiding these could
possibly keep some space.
I disagree. It's based on
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/, same as
the release git repository for Linux. I believe if one version is in
that page, it should also be in the git repository, even if it's a beta
or RC.
--
Xisco Faulí
LibreOffice QA Team
IRC: x1sc0
