On 22/10/2022 13:15, Chris Sherlock
wrote:
On 22 Oct 2022, at 9:36 pm, Paolo Vecchi <paolo.vecchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Paolo,
Hi Noel,
On 22/10/2022 08:27, Noel Grandin wrote:
Andreas actually didn't define what a CoI is, laws and regulations do.
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 23:32, Andreas Mantke <maand@xxxxxx> wrote:
The whole action was driven by members of the board with a (potential?)
Conflict of Interest (CoI) on just this topic.
This is just another way of attempting to exclude everybody you disagree with.
The way you define COI, everybody involved with LibreOiffce has a conflict of interest, so nobody should be commenting.
So that I can understand correctly, and as an outside party, are you alleging there *was* a conflict of interest in the actions taken by members of the Board?
I'm not all alleging anything at all.
I've simply described an hypothetical situation and reported an article I've recently read reporting the changes happening in the US market where having directors shared with multiple organisation with different interests seemed to be the norm.
There have been long, and still ongoing, discussions where different points of view have been shared and I've simply shared mine.
Being the president of a non profit association I know what rules I have to apply where I live but other countries might have slightly different rules.
Ciao
Chris
Paolo
-- Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature