On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 13:14 +0000, Andy Furniss wrote: > I would say 2 + 8 = 10 for pppoa/vc mux Dam, yes - brain explosion. I have no idea why I wrote 4 for the AAL5 overhead. It is 8. So Jason, the tables should in the next email of been: The complete table, for the _outbound_ direction going over an Ethernet link is: PPPoA + VC/Mux: tc class add htb … overhead -4 atm <-- This line is different (was -8) PPPoA + VC/LLC: tc class add htb … overhead 4 atm PPPoE + VC/Mux: tc class add htb … overhead 20 atm PPPoE + VC/LLC: tc class add htb … overhead 28 atm The complete table for incoming traffic on the IMQ device, regardless of the type of connection, is: PPPoA + VC/Mux: tc class add htb … overhead 10 atm PPPoA + VC/LLC: tc class add htb … overhead 18 atm PPPoE + VC/Mux: tc class add htb … overhead 34 atm PPPoE + VC/LLC: tc class add htb … overhead 42 atm _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
