Corey Hickey wrote: > > I still maintain ESFQ; the latest version is at: > http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ > > This would be an appropriate time to ask: > Does anybody have any fixes for or improvements to ESFQ that I don't > know about? My patch doesn't have anything revolutionary -- I've been > merely keeping Alexander Clouter's 2.6 port in sync with the upstream > changes to SFQ. > > -Corey 1) I'd like for your code to support kernel version 2.4! It is crazy that there are two branches of ESFQ. 2) ESFQ should be able to match a firewall mark, dport and sport. All except CLASSIC should understand NOT ("! sport 22"). 3) The documentation should be improved. -- gypsy _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
