RE: Load Balancer setting for Public Servers

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Julian,

Thank you for your reply.

I've some idea now. I'll try it and update you the outcome. :-D

Best regards,

Sureerat P.

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Anastasov [mailto:ja@xxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 2:14 PM
To: Sureerat P. (EQHO)
Cc: Nguyen Dinh Nam; lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE:  Load Balancer setting for Public Servers



	Hello,

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Sureerat P. (EQHO) wrote:

> Regarding Julian's suggestion, do you mean that CONNMARK is not necessary
> for this scenario? And also I don't have idea about lsrc and maddr you are

	connmark should work, you just need to set it up.

> mentioning. Could you please provide me the reference site so I can get
more
> details about it.

http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/dgd.txt
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/dgd-usage.txt

> To tell you the truth, even I'm confused but more knowledges I get from
> here. And I want to say "Thank you" for your all kindness. Tonight I will
> study deeper about your guideline and do more testing. Any progress, I'll
> update you via this mailing group.

	Yes, it is not easy, there is no complete solution for such
setups as the details can be very different, you have to combine
lots of scripts :)

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux