On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 02:16:59PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 17.04.2013, at 14:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > Il 17/04/2013 14:10, Alexander Graf ha scritto: > >>>> Still, __KVM_HAVE_IRQCHIP is clearly a subset of > >>>> __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC; defining one without the other makes no sense > >>>> and will cause compilation or link errors for trace_kvm_ack_irq. > >>>> > >>>> Either we drop it altogether, or we should not break compilation > >>>> consciously---especially if the problem is so trivial and obvious > >>>> that you had to think of leaving it out. > >> I disagree. I actually _want_ to break it on purpose, so we have even > >> more reason to remove all that useless code if nobody complains. > > > > Then remove it in patch 1, and move all the remaining IOAPIC code back > > to arch/x86 at the end. As things are, you're just leaving someone else > > to do the work (no matter if it is to fix it, or to zap it). > > Gleb, Marcelo, any objections to me removing ia64? > It was marked BROKEN less then year ago. I would give it one more year as a last chance. We can reconsider this during 3.11 development cycle, but if you want this code to make 3.10 can you please fix ia64 compilation. The patch on top of the series is OK. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
