On 17.04.2013, at 14:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 17/04/2013 14:10, Alexander Graf ha scritto: >>>> Still, __KVM_HAVE_IRQCHIP is clearly a subset of >>>> __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC; defining one without the other makes no sense >>>> and will cause compilation or link errors for trace_kvm_ack_irq. >>>> >>>> Either we drop it altogether, or we should not break compilation >>>> consciously---especially if the problem is so trivial and obvious >>>> that you had to think of leaving it out. >> I disagree. I actually _want_ to break it on purpose, so we have even >> more reason to remove all that useless code if nobody complains. > > Then remove it in patch 1, and move all the remaining IOAPIC code back > to arch/x86 at the end. As things are, you're just leaving someone else > to do the work (no matter if it is to fix it, or to zap it). Gleb, Marcelo, any objections to me removing ia64? Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
