Il 17/04/2013 14:10, Alexander Graf ha scritto: >>> Still, __KVM_HAVE_IRQCHIP is clearly a subset of >>> __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC; defining one without the other makes no sense >>> and will cause compilation or link errors for trace_kvm_ack_irq. >>> >>> Either we drop it altogether, or we should not break compilation >>> consciously---especially if the problem is so trivial and obvious >>> that you had to think of leaving it out. > I disagree. I actually _want_ to break it on purpose, so we have even > more reason to remove all that useless code if nobody complains. Then remove it in patch 1, and move all the remaining IOAPIC code back to arch/x86 at the end. As things are, you're just leaving someone else to do the work (no matter if it is to fix it, or to zap it). Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
