Re: [PATCH 2/7] KVM: Introduce __KVM_HAVE_IRQCHIP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 17/04/2013 14:10, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
>>> Still, __KVM_HAVE_IRQCHIP is clearly a subset of
>>> __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC; defining one without the other makes no sense
>>> and will cause compilation or link errors for trace_kvm_ack_irq.
>>> 
>>> Either we drop it altogether, or we should not break compilation 
>>> consciously---especially if the problem is so trivial and obvious
>>> that you had to think of leaving it out.
> I disagree. I actually _want_ to break it on purpose, so we have even
> more reason to remove all that useless code if nobody complains.

Then remove it in patch 1, and move all the remaining IOAPIC code back
to arch/x86 at the end.  As things are, you're just leaving someone else
to do the work (no matter if it is to fix it, or to zap it).

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux